Skip to main content

Pursuing the Dixons of Ryedale - Part 2

It's amazing what you can find in a day or two. I've been making good use of the parish registers in Ryedale and have been able to find answers to things i was looking. As a genealogist, anything that corroborates the date you have - or the assumptions - is much sought after. I answered one question but potentially opened up another. I knew that there were definitw connections to Lastingham, Kirkbymoorside and Helmsley.

Thomas Dixon, marriage and movements. 

I knew that Thomas Dixon (born about 1804) was a stone mason - and that he had lived in Lastingham. He had also given his birth location as Lastingham in the 1841 census.

However, a careful search of the Lastingham parish registers, generated nothing to confirm this. He actually belonged (according to the Lastingham parish registers) to the kirkbymoorside parish though when he married his wife - Mary Cook. This marriage took place in 1824. It suggests that he moved around a bit. The reason i say this is because i could not find a record for his birth in Kirkbymoorside parish registers also. Nor in Helmsley. In fact i struggled to find it almost anywhere.

Thomas with the parish listed as Kirkbymoorside and not Lastingham


I also learned something else unusual. Mary appears to have remarried (the surname Keech with a Bedfordshire connection crops up) though this needs validation. Thomas seems to never appear in the 1851 census - nor does his family as we see them in 1841. It is highly probable he died in his mid to perhaps late 30's. His son John Dixon (my 3rd great-grandfather) would have been quite young - at best a teenager - when that happened. He was fortunately old enough to have been apprenticed in to the trade that his father was doing - stone masonry.

I am still looking so i cannot take this at face value. More to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tracking down Frank Bloxham - Part 1

Frank Bloxham has no direct connection to me as such - however, his likely son, Frank Henry Simms  does indeed carries the genes of my 2nd great-aunt Charlotte Simms. I contacted a descendant of the family of Frank Henry Simms and passed the information i had over. I decided to take a closer look at this individual. To uncover the story behind the article and to track his movements after - and also, his origins. He was commonly called "Frank" (as such many were) but was born Francis A Bloxham . Francis Bloxham - 6 years old in the 1881 census. Like many families in Brailes there were common groups of families. The Bloxhams were quite a unique name and not as common compared to others. Brailes being as small as it was - and still is - it remains comparatively easy to track them around. Whilst working for a grocer in the following census he met Charlotte Simms. 1891 census. Francis was working as a grocers apprentice and Charlotte as a general servant (domestic).

Charlotte Simms, her son born out of wedlock, and who the probable father was.

As i go through my family tree i often mark down individuals for further consideration, especially if they are not priority research targets, and especially if initial research yields little. One such person was Charlotte Simms . I came across her when i was filling out the family of my 2nd great-grandfather William Simms. I found her, and marked her down with her year of birth, which was 1876 and in Brailes. I tend not to go into huge detail on indirect descendants of my connections straight away - and, even less so, those that are daughters. These can be, and are, explored at a later date. However i came across a curious article about a young girl called Charlotte Simms who simply had to be the same person. The story, published on the 14th of April 1892, and warranted deeper investigation. Article published 14th of April 1892 She was making a case against a young boy called Frank Bloxham that he was the father of her son born just a couple of months before on the 2nd of Jun

Standard Offering - Sample Output

I wanted to give an example of what can be expected for a standard offering. I was able to turn around the following, with appropriate citations (from BMD / census records) fairly quickly. The standard offering is a "no frills" 5 generation family tree ( your great great grandparents ). All i required was whatever information could be provided to me. To produce this tree the client gave me his name and birthday, his parents names and birthdates and his grandparents names. This may not be possible in every case - or more could be provided - but it is usually enough to do the job. There is also no guarantee that a tree can be filled out entirely. In this case it was. In the interest of confidentiality - the client, and his, parents are not included in the below screenshots. I loaded this .GED file into ancestry.co.uk to demonstrate, if you like, that you are able to continue the research yourself. The standard offering can be a good primer and start point for that. On the